
David J Grant is published by |
Interview with David J Grant by Cherie
Hill, First Book Review 16 July 2007 DJG
Useful but not that essential I believe you need a lot of life experience however gained.
It can be working in factory, building on the characters you have met, holidays, school -
weaving these thoughts and dreams into an interesting and where possible unique dialogue. DJG I've always found travel my own best source
for inspiration. The new environment and unfamiliar surroundings can stimulate the
imaginative juices plus travelling provides a lot of time for thought. DJG I spend most of the year in CH. How hard was that completing the last
chapter? DJG Very difficult and when I arrived in CH. So you had finished too soon back in DJG
Yes it really wasnt complete. I realized on the way to CH. David J
Grant is a pen name what is your real name and why the change? DJG My family
name is David Raven. I decided to change it because two of my three sons are published
authors and it would be very confusing for the readers and the book trade for us all
to have the same surname. Plus there was another very successful author of fiction called
Simon Raven who is no relation. DJG Yes
thats true. It was even more popular among many writers in the last centaury -
George Eliot and Charlotte Bronte used a pen name for some of her work. Andy McNab is a
very recent example. DJG The answer is a simple no. For some time I played with different ideas about credible stories that can incorporate real people already in the public domain. History quite often determines there is another often secret story hidden behind a major international issue that only comes to the surface years later. Margaret Thatchers Falklands War could be one for example regarding her friendship with General Pinochet and Ronald Regan what was she really up to? Perhaps we will never know in our lifetimes. Tony Blairs war on terror his relationship with George Bush what is in it for him in the long term? CH. People seem to like a good old conspiracy theory. DJG If
you look closer and let your mind wander there could so easily be a different motive for
many of the current actions taking place. One example of a secret treaty by a royal person
was the Treaty of Dover signed by Charles II and French King Louis in the 1600s.
Charles received an annual income from the French King, conditional on him becoming a
Catholic he conveniently forgot to mention this to his subjects at the time of
signing the documents! DJG LOL. I think thats a little
harsh to call it cashing in, especially as I have only spent money to date. The point is
when people in the public eye behave in a certain way and says things they may or may
not regret later, opinions are formed - they become the characters they represent. Take
Prince Philip as an example. It would have been incredulous to write a story in the
present time featuring a Prince and Consort to the Queen of England called lets say
Jim Mountbatten. There is only one and
will only ever be one Consort to Queen Elizabeth II and thats Prince Philip
warts and all. CH. And does that same rule apply to all of your
characters in The Treaty - Camilla for example? DJG No, not all but certainly the key people
already in the public domain. Camilla is a pretty unique person you couldnt write
about the wife of Prince Charles or ex-wife Diana by changing their names - the story
would lose all its credibility in the eye of the reader. I can remember reading Fourth
Estate by Jeffery Archer which I did enjoy. But it was really annoying having to mentally
keep changing the characters names in my mind since it was only possible for them to be
Rupert Murdoch and Robert Maxwell. I appreciate Archers dilemma regarding those two
billionaires in particular. He would probably have been seriously sued, particularly by
Maxwell, if he had used their real names. In fact I recall they did still try to stop
publication of the book. CH. Is there any risk The Treaty could be stopped
for using the real names of people like George Bush Senior in the story? DJG I see this as very unlikely since everything
I write about is essentially already in the public domain. These people we have referred
to have spent their lives being talked about in one way or another - it comes with the
territory. I have been very careful to portray all the characters as honestly as possible
and not to represent them in an unfair way. These people are by definition of their status
successful for something or other in public life and it would be crass and probably
dishonest to suggest different. CH. When you Google George Bush senior there are
lots of conspiracy stories about him. Are you saying these are all rubbish? DJG Not necessarily its just that any
public enquiries that have been held or investigations into his activities have cleared
him of any wrongdoing. As a leading politician he probably expects all of this innuendo as
part of his job. CH. So are we going to see a sequel to The Treaty?
I really enjoyed it by the way. DJG Thank you. Im not sure about a sequel
but I really do like the characters and would love to come up with another adventure for
Andy and perhaps Caroline. DJG My honest answer is that there are bits and
pieces of different people Ive known throughout my life in all of the characters.
This is inevitable however, Im quick to say they really are fictitious and represent
no one individual in particular. DJG No, Im saying it because it is true. The
story is very original although I quite expect many individuals will see themselves in the
characters - hopefully. DJG If Im honest I do like Caroline and
actually built her part up in the story. She is funny and strong a little bit of Angelina
Jones, Sharon Stone rolled into one. I also enjoyed the irreverent manner of Trudy; she is
very immature and a little sad. DJG Im
really not sure they just keep on coming. This must be based upon my age and experience
having met such a wide portfolio of people in all walks of life. CH. Well best of luck with this first novel and we
look forward to many more David J Grant adventures. DJG Thanks |